InformationWeek recently posted a rather lengthy article comparing the numerous smartphone platforms on the market today. Their list includes Symbian 9.3, Palm, WindowsMobile 5.0, Linux, Blackberry, and Mac OSX. Personally, I wouldn’t count Mac OSX (yes, the one on the iPhone) as a "smartphone platform," seeing as how it only uses java widgets, just like any other phone on the market can use, but whatever. 
It’s a very interesting article, and a good read (if you’ve got the time). However, one thing I did notice that I wanted to point out. On the front page, they show this graph. They’re obviously making the assumption that all "smartphones" are primarily used by businesses, and thus, that’s their target audience.
Well, given this chart, one would have to question why Symbian does so well in the world smartphone market. However, I think that’s the key selling point of Symbian. It’s not stodgey and reserved for businessmen with 1000+ contacts and corporate email and all that. It’s designed for regular users who want to have more functionality than the device they shave their face with.
What do you think? Do you think that "smartphone" is intended primarily for the business user, and that Symbian’s downfall to M$ is inevitable, or do you think they’ve carved the non-smartphone smartphone user niche pretty well?
(Via: SymbianWatch)















