Nokia’s Touch History

Iphone4_medium
Everyone seems to be in a big fervor over the 5 second display of what’s been dubbed as "Nokia’s iPhone." All the Apple Fanboys are obviously in an uproar over the notion that Nokia had the juevos to copy their overlord god chosen brand. As was pointed out by Stefan (and I heard it, too), Anssi Vanjoki, when questioned about it, said, "If there is something good in the world we copy with pride." I agree with that. If something works, and is popular, then why not? To the die-hard Nokia fans, it’s not like they’re going to shift every single handset to a touch-based system, so don’t worry.

As Stefan also mentions, there is some misinformation floating around as to who’s been working on touch interfaces first, and I want to lay those to rest. In the press event, Anssi said that Nokia’s been working with touch interfaces already, with the 770 and N800 Internet Tablets, and while he’s correct, he didn’t quite reach all the way back. Let’s take a look at 4 touch-interface phones that Nokia produced several years ago…

7710
The first that I want to mention is the 7700/7710, as showcased here by Maximus at the Just Another Mobile Phone blog (pics from Esato). This was running Symbian OS, with a Series 90 overlay. The 7700 never made it to market, but the 7710 did. It came equipped with a VGA cam and the full landscape touchscreen, with tri-band 900/1800/1900 GSM. Obviously it wasn’t really a hot seller when it came out in 2004, so they shelved it.

6708

There was also the 6108, released back in 2003, which was a regular 6000-series handset with a flip-down keypad that revealed a stylus/fingertip touch interface. This was only released for the Asian markets, however. You can check out Eldar’s review over at Mobile-Review.com here.

Nokia_aeon_concept
Another one that is alot more recent (so recent, in fact, that they haven’t even released it) is the Aeon, which is really only something from the Nokia Research Labs, but shows the things that they’re envisioning for the future of touch interfaces on phones.

Those are the only 3 that I recall personally. If anyone knows of any others, please leave them in the comments. Point being, touch is nothing new to Nokia. It’s something that they’ve had in their labs for quite a while, and I have no doubts that they’ve been watching the other touch devices, including the iPhone, WinMo, Palm, and other devices, to see how people are using touch-enabled devices. The Internet Tablets have also given them some primary research as to what consumers have come to expect from touching their devices.

What do you think? Do you think Nokia should steer clear of touch interfaces? Do you think they’ll just copy what everyone else has, or is there room for innovation still?

Random Posts

If you enjoyed this post, be sure to subscribe to Symbian-Guru.com's RSS feed to stay up to date on future articles.

10 Responses to “Nokia’s Touch History”

  1. Don’t forget the 6708 that came out last year….or 05?!?!…can’t remember….

  2. I’m incredibly excited to see what Nokia does next year with their touch phone. In fact, I’m more excited for the eventual battle between Nokia’s device, SE’s device (P3), and Motorola’s/Kodak’s device (see Boy Genius Report). I think it’ll shape up to be an interesting contest, and I can’t wait to see whose does a better job.

    That being said, I hope Nokia’s device pulls out all the stops and incorporates all the tech available in the N95 and possibly more.

  3. Making software for touchscreen interface gimmicks is simple and easy. I don’t understand why there is so much media focus on apple’s gadget. Apple does make the best computers… period. But, Apple doesn’t make the best gadgets…..undeniable, it is apple’s syncing software that’s really good. Nokia is 5 years slow in supporting mac users and nokia’s pc suite needs improvement.

  4. i think when he says “copy it with pride” it means that nokias gonna make something similar to the iphone but way better

  5. Ricky is calling out another group of fanboys? Pot. Kettle. Black.

  6. Haha, touche, Snailgun.

  7. Add the Nokia 6708 to your list too - http://feetup.org/wiki/Nokia6708

    Even if it is “just” a rebranded BenQ phone, it gains kudos for being Nokia’s first (and last?) UIQ Symbian phone.

    I don’t know if you ever used a Nokia 7710, but it was quite a cool device, and the specifications are frighteningly similar to the iPhone in many ways, except it had goodies like decent Bluetooth, user-installable apps, mms etc.

  8. Touchscreens are mainly improving navigation (in menus, folders, web,…) but they also have negative aspects to usability (just try to play a complex game by only touching your screen). And of course, they are more expensive than a normal display.
    For me, a touchscreen could only be an additional input method to normal keys. So, equipping a phone like the N95 with a touchscreen would be really handy but I’m not shure if I’d be willing to pay for it.

  9. I OWNED an 7710. It was AWESOME.
    Indeed it was my primary device all the way until I got my E61.

    I am so saddended that Apple got the users. Nokia could have owned the cake. But 1) it came too early 2) it didn’t have the Apple hype and 3) it was big and never had a successor.

    Ps: touch is supposed to be Without a stylus. otherwise it’s too clumsy.

  10. [...] working on a touchscreen UI based on S60. In fact, it’s also no secret that Nokia has a long history of touchscreen devices, starting with the 7710 back in 2004, and going forward to the Internet Tablets that we have today. [...]

Leave a Reply

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>