<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sandisk Ultra 8GB MicroSD &#8211; Better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html</link>
	<description>Everything You Need To Know About Symbian, Straight From The Guru</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutchdaun</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/comment-page-2#comment-22714</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutchdaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 00:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html#comment-22714</guid>
		<description>Good review! I have been telling Nokia owner for years now, if you get a card, invest in the fastest you can get. Anyting below class6 slows your phone down to a crawl. The faster the better, but in my opinion do yourself a favor and get a class 6 or faster. People often blame Nokia while they should blame themselves for buying a slow card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review! I have been telling Nokia owner for years now, if you get a card, invest in the fastest you can get. Anyting below class6 slows your phone down to a crawl. The faster the better, but in my opinion do yourself a favor and get a class 6 or faster. People often blame Nokia while they should blame themselves for buying a slow card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unRheal</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/comment-page-2#comment-20532</link>
		<dc:creator>unRheal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html#comment-20532</guid>
		<description>I doubt that the size of the card is what is actually affects the speed. More likely they used slower chips for the 8 than the 6. With these &quot;class x&quot; ratings, they&#039;re all some range xMB/s - yMB/s, so if the 6 was at the top of class 4, and the 8 at the bottom, you could see a difference. I also think they&#039;re not necessarily exact - since the other thing to consider is the latency. It could transfer at 20MB/s, but if it has 2000ms latency, it&#039;s still going to take over 2 seconds to transfer a 512k (or any) block.&lt;br&gt;Windows isn&#039;t great for measuring that stuff unless you have some software that can guarantee that it&#039;s bypassing the cache - or -maybe- if you rebooted after each individual test or something. High transfer rates are good if you&#039;re moving a lot of large files, but I get the impression that there&#039;s a lot of high-latency stuff around now, so small, random reads are going to take a big hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that the size of the card is what is actually affects the speed. More likely they used slower chips for the 8 than the 6. With these &#8220;class x&#8221; ratings, they&#39;re all some range xMB/s &#8211; yMB/s, so if the 6 was at the top of class 4, and the 8 at the bottom, you could see a difference. I also think they&#39;re not necessarily exact &#8211; since the other thing to consider is the latency. It could transfer at 20MB/s, but if it has 2000ms latency, it&#39;s still going to take over 2 seconds to transfer a 512k (or any) block.<br />Windows isn&#39;t great for measuring that stuff unless you have some software that can guarantee that it&#39;s bypassing the cache &#8211; or -maybe- if you rebooted after each individual test or something. High transfer rates are good if you&#39;re moving a lot of large files, but I get the impression that there&#39;s a lot of high-latency stuff around now, so small, random reads are going to take a big hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unRheal</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/comment-page-2#comment-20310</link>
		<dc:creator>unRheal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html#comment-20310</guid>
		<description>I doubt that the size of the card is what is actually affects the speed. More likely they used slower chips for the 8 than the 6. With these &quot;class x&quot; ratings, they&#039;re all some range xMB/s - yMB/s, so if the 6 was at the top of class 4, and the 8 at the bottom, you could see a difference. I also think they&#039;re not necessarily exact - since the other thing to consider is the latency. It could transfer at 20MB/s, but if it has 2000ms latency, it&#039;s still going to take over 2 seconds to transfer a 512k (or any) block.&lt;br&gt;Windows isn&#039;t great for measuring that stuff unless you have some software that can guarantee that it&#039;s bypassing the cache - or -maybe- if you rebooted after each individual test or something. High transfer rates are good if you&#039;re moving a lot of large files, but I get the impression that there&#039;s a lot of high-latency stuff around now, so small, random reads are going to take a big hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that the size of the card is what is actually affects the speed. More likely they used slower chips for the 8 than the 6. With these &#8220;class x&#8221; ratings, they&#39;re all some range xMB/s &#8211; yMB/s, so if the 6 was at the top of class 4, and the 8 at the bottom, you could see a difference. I also think they&#39;re not necessarily exact &#8211; since the other thing to consider is the latency. It could transfer at 20MB/s, but if it has 2000ms latency, it&#39;s still going to take over 2 seconds to transfer a 512k (or any) block.<br />Windows isn&#39;t great for measuring that stuff unless you have some software that can guarantee that it&#39;s bypassing the cache &#8211; or -maybe- if you rebooted after each individual test or something. High transfer rates are good if you&#39;re moving a lot of large files, but I get the impression that there&#39;s a lot of high-latency stuff around now, so small, random reads are going to take a big hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: si254</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/comment-page-2#comment-19841</link>
		<dc:creator>si254</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html#comment-19841</guid>
		<description>fair enough, thanks for replying anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fair enough, thanks for replying anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Cadden</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/comment-page-2#comment-19838</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Cadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html#comment-19838</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to argue the point anymore. I have the card in my hand, and it&#039;s a class 8. If you don&#039;t want to believe me, suit yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not going to argue the point anymore. I have the card in my hand, and it&#39;s a class 8. If you don&#39;t want to believe me, suit yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: si254</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/comment-page-2#comment-19833</link>
		<dc:creator>si254</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html#comment-19833</guid>
		<description>that is a class 6 card; i haven&#039;t found one class 8 on the market</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is a class 6 card; i haven&#39;t found one class 8 on the market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G00fY</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/comment-page-2#comment-17711</link>
		<dc:creator>G00fY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html#comment-17711</guid>
		<description>Oh sry, I thought this article was from 2009 xD

Just forget it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh sry, I thought this article was from 2009 xD</p>
<p>Just forget it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G00fY</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/comment-page-2#comment-31706</link>
		<dc:creator>G00fY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html#comment-31706</guid>
		<description>Oh sry, I thought this article was from 2009 xD

Just forget it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh sry, I thought this article was from 2009 xD</p>
<p>Just forget it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G00fY</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/comment-page-2#comment-17710</link>
		<dc:creator>G00fY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html#comment-17710</guid>
		<description>@The Guru: Could it be possible that &quot;wolf&quot; is rigth? That as he said in his second post, the numer just looks like a 8 but is a 6? I also never heared about Class 8 cards and can&#039;t find anything about a launch in the near future ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The Guru: Could it be possible that &#8220;wolf&#8221; is rigth? That as he said in his second post, the numer just looks like a 8 but is a 6? I also never heared about Class 8 cards and can&#8217;t find anything about a launch in the near future ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G00fY</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html/comment-page-2#comment-31705</link>
		<dc:creator>G00fY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2008/09/sandisk-ultra-8gb-microsd-better.html#comment-31705</guid>
		<description>@The Guru: Could it be possible that &quot;wolf&quot; is rigth? That as he said in his second post, the numer just looks like a 8 but is a 6? I also never heared about Class 8 cards and can&#039;t find anything about a launch in the near future ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The Guru: Could it be possible that &#8220;wolf&#8221; is rigth? That as he said in his second post, the numer just looks like a 8 but is a 6? I also never heared about Class 8 cards and can&#8217;t find anything about a launch in the near future ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

