Dotsisx

Dotsisx, aka Rita El Khoury, joined Symbian-Guru.com in September of 2007, and has been writing awesome content ever since. Rita often explores the normal user aspect of Symbian-powered devices, and offers in-depth thoughts on various topics. You can follow Dotsisx on Twitter at @Khouryrt

If you enjoyed this post, be sure to subscribe to Symbian-Guru.com's RSS feed to stay up to date on future articles. You can also follow us on Twitter: @SymbianGuru


  • Give us linux users some cred though. We're a technical bunch, thorough with bug reports/testing, and a lot of us are developing stuff so targeting us in some ways is always good for development.

    On a side note, loving the E71 and it's working well with my Ubuntu machine. Tethering "just works" with the new beta Intrepid.
  • Viipottaja
    Pheewwww.. I mean - you have to be analytical and not just make statements like:

    "There’s no reason for Nokia not to hire a few developers for Mac and others for Linux to port all their existing software, and make life easier for everyone."

    OF COURSE there may be, and apparently their anylysis is that there IS a reason not to do it. I think its relatively safe to assume that Nokia has better market analysis and capacity to make strategy analysis and strategic decisions than any of us on these blogs. Their cost/benefit analysis shows that its not worth the cost and effort. There is ALWAYS a cost (monetary and opportunity cost) involved.

    "if you want to dominate on the software and service front, you need to cater to everyone, and not just the majority"

    Can you back that statement up? WHY would you need to cater to everyone to dominate? Noone is catering to everyone. There may be many strategic reasons, but also in pure cost terms the law of diminishing returns quickly comes to play. To gain 1% more market share at the marging becomes more and more difficult and expensive. At some point it just doesn't make sense anymore. On the software side, it is probably more strategic for them to try to get their offering together and running well where the VAST majority of the market is. And we all know Nokia has still a lot of work to do there.

    Finally, in current economic and financial times, even huger corps (and perhaps them in particular) have to thread carefully and not take a shotgun approach, in particular in a business are where they are still in stages of their efforts to gain hold.
  • Well put, Viipottaja.

    On another note, Mac USED to be the platform for the hip, creative, and feature conscious, but that changed long ago. The best content creation tools are now PC centric, with Mac support secondary. The Windows desktop platform is more upgradeable, faster, more configurable, and today's content creator's choice.

    As a music producer, I saw this shift first hand, and think Nokia is wise to focus on Windows. I think its a mistake to not at least put more focus on Ubuntu and Maemo, though. I think Nokia should always focus on the elite tinkering developers, and Linux is a hotbed for them.
  • Viipottaja
    Actually Nokia is putting a lot of effort into Linux mobile OS/UI platforms as you all probably/obviously know - just thought to note that. Nokia has been, AFAIK, in the last couple of years probably most systematic about support to open source among the mobile vendors (i.e. Maemo and IT Tablets) - until Android came along (although, from the little I've read on it, its apparently not quite community driven as initially though). On that note, is Moto still pursuing Linux on phones? They have seem to been a bit all over the place when it comes to OS on their smarter phones.

    Desktop support for Linux is obviously a different story.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Maemo-Guru.com Shop For Maemo Gear

Archives