Steve Litchfield has taken the opportunity to lambast the BBC for a recent piece quoting people from Adaptive Mobile and F-Secure, two companies that conveniently offer commercial anti-virus software for S60-powered smartphones. The article goes on to warn readers of the threats of mobile viruses, particularly to the Symbian platform.
As Steve correctly points out, there are several steps that a consumer would have to manually proceed through in order to actually get a mobile virus on their smartphone:
Viruses running amok? Really? Working their way through the contact book? Really?
- On every single S60 3rd Edition phone (which is the majority, these days, and growing fast in terms of percentage points worldwide), Symbian OS 9 contains ‘platform security’, meaning that there’s simply no way a piece of malware could call out in the way described without warning the user every single time it wants to do anything.
- And that’s assuming that the user was foolish enough to manually accept three or more explicit warnings during the installation of the said piece of malware.
- And that’s assuming that the user was foolish enough to accept the incoming Bluetooth or MMS item in the first place.
However, while we bloggers can assure you that the platform, at least in 3rd Edition, is secure, I’m curious as to Nokia’s part in educating consumers of the reality of the situation. My case in point is the inclusion of F-Secure’s mobile security application in the Nokia Download! client of most of our phones, such as my Nokia E71. Why, if the platform is secure, is this misleading application even allowed in here?
What do you think? Should Nokia be encouraging this nonsense by including the application in their Download! client, or should they protect the reputation of the platform? Have you actually gotten a virus on your S60 3rd Edition smartphone? Would you even admit it if you did?















