<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are T-Mobile And Nokia Making Up?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2009/11/are-t-mobile-and-nokia-making-up.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2009/11/are-t-mobile-and-nokia-making-up.html</link>
	<description>Everything You Need To Know About Symbian, Straight From The Guru</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2009/11/are-t-mobile-and-nokia-making-up.html/comment-page-1#comment-19349</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/?p=9622#comment-19349</guid>
		<description>I hope that rumors related a T-Mobile branded N900 pan out. I am using the N97 on AT&amp;T&#039;s 3G and it is terrible in comparison to the 3G speeds with T-M and other phone manufacturers. I am month-2-month with AT&amp;T and if the branded N900 is a reality (with 2 yr contract) or the reliability is not as bad as the N97 then I will go back to T-M. They were great with my E71 without 3G.

Oh, and I did use my N97 on T-M sans 3G for about a week. While there was a noticeable difference in performance once I switched to AT&amp;T the issues I have with dropping calls and retaining signal are too great to justify staying with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that rumors related a T-Mobile branded N900 pan out. I am using the N97 on AT&amp;T&#8217;s 3G and it is terrible in comparison to the 3G speeds with T-M and other phone manufacturers. I am month-2-month with AT&amp;T and if the branded N900 is a reality (with 2 yr contract) or the reliability is not as bad as the N97 then I will go back to T-M. They were great with my E71 without 3G.</p>
<p>Oh, and I did use my N97 on T-M sans 3G for about a week. While there was a noticeable difference in performance once I switched to AT&amp;T the issues I have with dropping calls and retaining signal are too great to justify staying with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2009/11/are-t-mobile-and-nokia-making-up.html/comment-page-1#comment-19348</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symbian-guru.com/?p=9622#comment-19348</guid>
		<description>The 5230 sounds great to me.  Yes the 5800 (which I own) is already reasonably price IF you are comparing it to other smart-phones, but really they are all very expensive compared to what I can afford!

The money you save by buying the 5230 can go towards your data plan - and then you don&#039;t need the Wi-Fi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 5230 sounds great to me.  Yes the 5800 (which I own) is already reasonably price IF you are comparing it to other smart-phones, but really they are all very expensive compared to what I can afford!</p>
<p>The money you save by buying the 5230 can go towards your data plan &#8211; and then you don&#8217;t need the Wi-Fi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

